A few weeks ago I overheard a conversation at a party about one of my favourite televison series HBO's
Girls. I've been thinking about writing a post on my experiences watching the series, reading about it in the media and discussing it with friends. I just couldn't stop thinking about this one comment so I decided to use it as a catalyst to start sharing my thoughts.
I overheard one of the young woman seated in a mid-century lounge chair say "oh, they're just making fun of
Sex and the City".
Ah! (I hope I didn't betray my disagreement too much with my facial expression, luckily I was seated clear across the room on a couch). To me this statement couldn't be farther from the truth. There aren't strong references to
Sex and the City (STC) in Lena Dunham, Jennifer Konner and Judd Apatow's scripts. Most of the episodes foray into territory uncharted before in the primetime schedule. Yes, it takes place in New York City (Brooklyn not Manhattan) and there are multiple female characters but to me the resemblance stops there.
Girls has more depth, character and more in common with my single girl reality than the haute couture clad women of
Sex and the City. (Which also reminds me of Alison Pill's character's outburst in the season finale of
The Newsroom about how disconnected
STC was with reality
. The Newsroom is another HBO series by Aaron Sorkin, I may have grown accustom to watching on repeat).
I've also heard/read comments that say that
Girls is a show about nothing, just a way for Dunham to be naked on the television and how the second series is not as funny or good as the first.
Seinfield reference aside, what the second series lacks in humour, it makes up in its expression of humanity
—from exploring the realities of mental illness, the limits of our inner ears to the struggles young women encounter in their parental and romantic relationships. To me there is a whole lot going on that needs to be unpacked. For instance season two episode five entitled "One man's trash" guest starting Patrick Wilson, revealed the raw yet strong voice of Hannah, her insecurities and her need for connection. Which is sadly revoked by Wilson's character as we encounter his inability (when it mattered to her most) to relate to Hannah or be open with himself. For me it was a revealing moment, awkward like most moments in the show, but it had the ability to draw me deeper into Hannah's frustrated sense of being. Something not all the alien from my own experiences.
Returning to my main argument, another aspect of Hannah's life that makes
Girls different from
Sex and the City is her bout with anxiety and writer's block Hannah, which she experiences when trying to write an ebook within a tight deadline. I only recall an episode or two where Carrie struggles with her own writing, struggles with relationships were plenty, but reflective writing always seemed to come to her. Hannah's struggle with writing, her reaction to hide from her closest friend in her apartment and then hitting rock bottom as she suffers episodes of OCD are all places I bet many of us have been, but haven't been able to reflect upon in the same very public way that Dunham is able to. Yes, she might have the connections and the writing skills, but I don't think she's far off from many people's experiences or realities in life.
I'm excited to see what happens to the show in it's third season, the finale of the second was more positive than I had expected and yet many of the characters could have been said to have fallen backwards, into familiar old relationships (a bit worrisome to this viewer). I'm not sure how optimistic I can be about this peace lasting, I mean, didn't it take six seasons and a movie for Carrie to finally have the lasting relationship she was looking for with Mr. Big? I guess like all things in life only time and HBO's scheduling will tell.